一级鲁丝片-一级看片免费视频-一级看片-一级精品视频-精品一区国产-精品一区二区在线欧美日韩

備考資料:GMAT優(yōu)秀作文精選(39)

雕龍文庫(kù) 分享 時(shí)間: 收藏本文

備考資料:GMAT優(yōu)秀作文精選(39)

  為了方便廣大考生更好的復(fù)習(xí),綜合整理了備考資料:GMAT優(yōu)秀作文精選,以供各位考生考試復(fù)習(xí)參考,希望對(duì)考生復(fù)習(xí)有所幫助。

  39. The following appeared in an Avia Airlines departmental memorandum.

  On average, 9 out of every 1,000 passengers who traveled on Avia Airlines last year filed a complaint about our baggage-handling procedures. This means that although some 1 percent of our passengers were unhappy with those procedures, the overwhelming majority were quite satisfied with them; thus it would appear that a review of the procedures is not important to our goal of maintaining or increasing the number of Avias passengers.

  Discuss how well reasoned... etc.

  The conclusion in this Avia Airlines memorandum is that a review of the airlines baggage-handling procedures will not further its goal of maintaining or increasing the number of Avia passengers. The authors line of reasoning is that the great majority of Avia passengers are happy with baggage handling at the airline because only one percent of passengers who traveled on Avia last year filed a complaint about Avias procedures. This argument is problematic in two important respects.

  First, the argument turns on the assumption that the 99 percent of Avia passengers who did not complain were happy with the airlines baggage-handling procedures. However, the author provides no evidence to support this assumption. The fact that, on the average, 9 out of 1000 passengers took the time and effort to formally complain indicates nothing about the experiences or attitudes of the remaining 991. It is possible that many passengers were displeased but too busy to formally complain, while others had no opinion at all. Lacking more complete information about passengers attitudes, we cannot assume that the great majority of passengers who did not complain were happy.

  Secondly, in the absence of information about the number of passengers per flight and about the complaint records of competing airlines, the statistics presented in the memorandum might distort the seriousness of the problem. Given that most modern aircraft carry as many as 300 to 500 passengers, it is possible that Avia received as many as 4 or 5 complaints per flight. The author unfairly trivializes this record. Moreover, the author fails to compare Avias record with those of its competitors. It is possible that a particular competitor received virtually no baggage-handling complaints last year. If so, Avias one percent complaint rate might be significant enough to motivate customers to switch to another airline.

  In conclusion, the author has failed to demonstrate that a review of the baggage-handling procedures at Avia Airlines is not needed to maintain or increase the number of Avias passengers. To strengthen the argument, the author must at the very least provide affirmative evidence that most Avia passengers last year were indeed happy with baggage-handling procedures. To better evaluate the argument, we would need more information about the numbers of Avia passengers per flight last year and about the baggage-handling records of Avias competitors.

  小編提醒:考生們可在日常生活中多讀范文,多練筆,培養(yǎng)出好的語(yǔ)感和邏輯,這樣才能在考試中寫(xiě)出優(yōu)秀的作文。

  

  為了方便廣大考生更好的復(fù)習(xí),綜合整理了備考資料:GMAT優(yōu)秀作文精選,以供各位考生考試復(fù)習(xí)參考,希望對(duì)考生復(fù)習(xí)有所幫助。

  39. The following appeared in an Avia Airlines departmental memorandum.

  On average, 9 out of every 1,000 passengers who traveled on Avia Airlines last year filed a complaint about our baggage-handling procedures. This means that although some 1 percent of our passengers were unhappy with those procedures, the overwhelming majority were quite satisfied with them; thus it would appear that a review of the procedures is not important to our goal of maintaining or increasing the number of Avias passengers.

  Discuss how well reasoned... etc.

  The conclusion in this Avia Airlines memorandum is that a review of the airlines baggage-handling procedures will not further its goal of maintaining or increasing the number of Avia passengers. The authors line of reasoning is that the great majority of Avia passengers are happy with baggage handling at the airline because only one percent of passengers who traveled on Avia last year filed a complaint about Avias procedures. This argument is problematic in two important respects.

  First, the argument turns on the assumption that the 99 percent of Avia passengers who did not complain were happy with the airlines baggage-handling procedures. However, the author provides no evidence to support this assumption. The fact that, on the average, 9 out of 1000 passengers took the time and effort to formally complain indicates nothing about the experiences or attitudes of the remaining 991. It is possible that many passengers were displeased but too busy to formally complain, while others had no opinion at all. Lacking more complete information about passengers attitudes, we cannot assume that the great majority of passengers who did not complain were happy.

  Secondly, in the absence of information about the number of passengers per flight and about the complaint records of competing airlines, the statistics presented in the memorandum might distort the seriousness of the problem. Given that most modern aircraft carry as many as 300 to 500 passengers, it is possible that Avia received as many as 4 or 5 complaints per flight. The author unfairly trivializes this record. Moreover, the author fails to compare Avias record with those of its competitors. It is possible that a particular competitor received virtually no baggage-handling complaints last year. If so, Avias one percent complaint rate might be significant enough to motivate customers to switch to another airline.

  In conclusion, the author has failed to demonstrate that a review of the baggage-handling procedures at Avia Airlines is not needed to maintain or increase the number of Avias passengers. To strengthen the argument, the author must at the very least provide affirmative evidence that most Avia passengers last year were indeed happy with baggage-handling procedures. To better evaluate the argument, we would need more information about the numbers of Avia passengers per flight last year and about the baggage-handling records of Avias competitors.

  小編提醒:考生們可在日常生活中多讀范文,多練筆,培養(yǎng)出好的語(yǔ)感和邏輯,這樣才能在考試中寫(xiě)出優(yōu)秀的作文。

  

信息流廣告 競(jìng)價(jià)托管 招生通 周易 易經(jīng) 代理招生 二手車 網(wǎng)絡(luò)推廣 自學(xué)教程 招生代理 旅游攻略 非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn) 河北信息網(wǎng) 石家莊人才網(wǎng) 買(mǎi)車咨詢 河北人才網(wǎng) 精雕圖 戲曲下載 河北生活網(wǎng) 好書(shū)推薦 工作計(jì)劃 游戲攻略 心理測(cè)試 石家莊網(wǎng)絡(luò)推廣 石家莊招聘 石家莊網(wǎng)絡(luò)營(yíng)銷 培訓(xùn)網(wǎng) 好做題 游戲攻略 考研真題 代理招生 心理咨詢 游戲攻略 興趣愛(ài)好 網(wǎng)絡(luò)知識(shí) 品牌營(yíng)銷 商標(biāo)交易 游戲攻略 短視頻代運(yùn)營(yíng) 秦皇島人才網(wǎng) PS修圖 寶寶起名 零基礎(chǔ)學(xué)習(xí)電腦 電商設(shè)計(jì) 職業(yè)培訓(xùn) 免費(fèi)發(fā)布信息 服裝服飾 律師咨詢 搜救犬 Chat GPT中文版 語(yǔ)料庫(kù) 范文網(wǎng) 工作總結(jié) 二手車估價(jià) 情侶網(wǎng)名 愛(ài)采購(gòu)代運(yùn)營(yíng) 情感文案 古詩(shī)詞 邯鄲人才網(wǎng) 鐵皮房 衡水人才網(wǎng) 石家莊點(diǎn)痣 微信運(yùn)營(yíng) 養(yǎng)花 名酒回收 石家莊代理記賬 女士發(fā)型 搜搜作文 石家莊人才網(wǎng) 銅雕 關(guān)鍵詞優(yōu)化 圍棋 chatGPT 讀后感 玄機(jī)派 企業(yè)服務(wù) 法律咨詢 chatGPT國(guó)內(nèi)版 chatGPT官網(wǎng) 勵(lì)志名言 兒童文學(xué) 河北代理記賬公司 教育培訓(xùn) 游戲推薦 抖音代運(yùn)營(yíng) 朋友圈文案 男士發(fā)型 培訓(xùn)招生 文玩 大可如意 保定人才網(wǎng) 黃金回收 承德人才網(wǎng) 石家莊人才網(wǎng) 模型機(jī) 高度酒 沐盛有禮 公司注冊(cè) 造紙術(shù) 唐山人才網(wǎng) 沐盛傳媒
主站蜘蛛池模板: 最近免费中文完整在线观看视频 | 久久久精品久久久久久久久久久 | 国产精品视频公开费视频 | 丁香六月婷婷激情 | 精品久久一区二区三区 | 最近的中文字幕 | 男人的天堂天堂网 | 四虎影视国产精品一区二区 | 国产成人综合精品一区 | 精品一区二区三区在线成人 | 精品久久一区二区 | 五月天激情丁香 | 全黄性性激高免费视频 | 在线中文字幕第一页 | 羞羞视频免费网站 | 羞羞视频免费看 | 深爱婷婷 | 国产高清视频在线播放 | 久久综合丁香 | 色婷婷影院| 亚洲综合色丁香婷婷六月图片 | 国产小视频在线免费观看 | 六月丁香深爱六月综合激情 | 中文无码热在线视频 | 久久久久久国产精品免费免费 | 激情六月天婷婷 | 俄罗斯三级最新电影 | 羞羞色院电影 | 免费观看男女羞羞的视频网站 | 老子影院午夜久久亚洲 | 亚洲欧美日韩国产精品网 | 丁香花婷婷 | 久久精品综合一区二区三区 | 蜜桃视频一区 | 欧美成人一区二区三区不卡 | 精品久久久久久中文字幕一区 | 久久91精品久久久久久水蜜桃 | 在线看片免费人成视久网下载 | 国产精品入口麻豆 | 中文字幕不卡一区 二区三区 | 羞羞视频免费网站在线看 |